The Endocrine Disruptor Page HomeSitemap
 

Chemical Safety Office
Evaluation and Licensing Division
Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare

Japanese

Last updated date: March 30, 2015
 

Home

 Advisory Committee

   Actions

     Scheme

     Overview

FAQs

Bisphenol A

Reports, etc.

Related reports

Links

Contact


 
Reports

Advisory Committee on Health Effects of Endocrine Disruptors
The Supplement II to the Intermediary Report
1.4.2.2_1

 

contents  Detailed contents  << prev  next >>

  3) Retrospective case-control studies
Population-based studies include Millikan et al. (2000) who reports a risk increase by PCB in a group entirely consisting of blacks, and Romieu et al (2000) who found a risk increase by DDE in a population in Mexico. In studies of a Canadian population, Demers et al. did not observe effects of the total PCB in 2000 but detailed analysis in 2002 indicated significant risk increase in a group with high levels of PCB118, PCB156 and mono-ortho-PCB homologues in plasma. Pavuk et al (2003) report a decrease in risk for the group with high serum levels of Wolff class 1 compounds (PCB28, 52, 101). Gammon et al. (2002) did not observe risk increase by PCB or organochlorine pesticides. Using the place and length of residence and fish intake as surrogate exposure indexes, significant correlation of breast cancer risk was found with the length of residence by McKelvey et al. (2004) and, for women before menopause, with intake of fish from Great Lakes by McElroy (2004), while Brody et al. (2004) observed no significant correlation with exposure to pesticides applied around the residence.
About the half of the 29 hospital-based studies observe any significant correlation of increase in breast cancer risk : with the total PCB, number of PCB peaks, and level of moderately chlorinated PCB by Moysich et al (1998); with PCB77 and HCB for estrogen receptor-positive postmenopausal women by Liljegren et al. (1998); with DDE by Olaya-Contreras et al. (1998); in a group of CYP1A1-val carriers exposed to high PCB level by Moysich et al. (1999); with PCB183 by Stellman et al. (2000); with PCB105 and PCB118 in premenopausal cases by Aronson et al. (2000); with DDT by Wolff et al. (2000); with DDE in estrogen receptor-negative cases by Woolcott et al. (2001); with DDT and HCB by Charlier et al. (2002); in persons under 55 who have experiences in farm work by Brophy et al. (2002); and with p,p'-DDE and HCB by Charlier et al. (2004). Significantly higher levels in blood were reported for DDE by Charles et al. (2001); and for HCHs, heptachlor, aldrin, DDE, DDD, DDT, etc. by Mathur et al. (2002). McMready et al. (2004) studied the relationship with breast cancer risk of 19 organochlorine compounds including PCBs and 7 polymorphic genes including CYP1A1 and GSTM1, as well as their interactions. They found significant risk increases for PCB105 and DDE, and significant interactions between GSTM1 and oxychlordane, HCB and β-HCH. However, the researcher did not conclude that gene polymorphism modifies breast cancer risk by organochlorine compounds on the ground that the subject group was small (70 cases) and that the tests were repeated many times. Holford et al. (2000) observed a significant decrease of risk. Other papers do not report any significant correlation with breast cancer risk. No other substance was correlated with the risk, either.

contents  Detailed contents  << prev  next >>

 

 

About links, copyright, etc. Privacy policy

(C) 2005, 2016 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, All Rights Reserved.